An article in today’s New York Times begins:

Under pressure to do more to confront the Ebola outbreak sweeping across West Africa, President Obama on Tuesday is to announce…”

Does it seem to you, as it does to me, that President Obama has been under pressure in all sorts of ways lately?  I decided to ask Google.

March 3, 2014: “Obama under pressure to take strong stand against Russia” (AM Australia)

April 18, 2014: “Obama is under pressure to make a decision on the future of the [Keystone] pipeline during his second term” (KPCC News)

May 21, 2014: “Under pressure to respond, Obama addresses VA hospital scandal” (CBS News)

June 17, 2014: “Obama Under Pressure to Act Fast in Iraq” (ABC News)

July 3, 2014: “Obama under pressure to visit U.S. – Mexico border” (AP)

August 18, 2014: “President Barack Obama is under increasing pressure to speak out more forcefully on the growing unrest in Ferguson…” (ABC News – Denver)

August 22, 2014: “Obama under pressure to expand strikes on ISIS into Syria” (Fox News Carolina)

August 31, 2014: “Obama under pressure to delay immigration action until after midterms” (Fox News)

September 13, 2014: “Obama Under Pressure To Include Boko Haram In War Against ISIS” (The Guardian)

Do we really have a reluctant leader — as David Brooks recently wrote — who must be pressured into action?  Or is all this so-called pressure simply ginned up by the news media to create a sense of drama?  Barack Obama could tell us, but we will probably have to wait for his memoir to find out.  I’m sure he will be pressured to write one.

Be the first to comment | Read other posts in News and Comment

Joan Rivers is not the only person who wrote elaborate directions as to the style and content of her own funeral.  I also have such instructions, but they differ a little from those of Ms. Rivers.  I want my funeral to be full of the things I can’t stand now.  I don’t want to enjoy anything about being dead — so here is how my send-off should go:

• All attendees must undergo security wanding and take their shoes and socks off.

• I want it to be a big showbiz affair with all the Hollywood personalities.  The one-name celebrities (Cher, Madonna, Bono, Beyonce, et al) get to sit at the front.

• I want an open-casket ceremony, with tearful multitudes waiting in line to grasp my cold dead hand, as they think to themselves, “I didn’t know he looked this bad!”

• Speaking of cold dead hands, I want to be buried with my automatic rifle.  Someone needs to go out and buy me one before the service.

• Put me in some flimsy polyester trousers that make it obvious which way I dress.

• Give me a clear-coat manicure.  Or what the hell, any color, as long as it is very shiny.

• I want Neil Diamond to sing “Cracklin’ Rosie” and throw in an extra verse or two of bah-bup-uppah-dah.  And if Mr. Diamond is not alive at the time of my funeral, I want all six-hundred attendees to bring iPods (which I also hate) and play “Cracklin’ Rosie” in unison, at full volume, through their earbuds.

• I want a famous Christian evangelist (Rick Warren will do, just as slippery as the rest) to proclaim to the crowd that I am in a better place now.  He should also assert that I really did love Jesus, in my own way, and that God is now reading my blog.

• In the same vein, I want at least three people to walk up to the lectern and tell the attendees what I would have wanted, if I were still alive.

• I want John Boehner to speak.  He’s good for a cry, and he will insult all my friends.

• I also want former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan to speak.  I want her to say, in her typical pained, melodramatic fashion, how tragically misguided my political beliefs were.   And I want her to say those very words — “tragically misguided.”

• For pallbearers, I select Vladimir Putin.  By himself.  With his shirt off.

• At the wake, I want the open bar to close down after fifteen minutes.  No, make that ten.  Why should I be the only one to suffer?

• Also at the wake, I want the server to go around and ask, “Beef Wellington or Pasta?”  Except that I want the Beef Wellington to abruptly “run out” after the first five people.

In the end, people who attend my funeral will be really sorry that I died!  As it should be.

Be the next to comment | Read other posts in Humour, News and Comment

I have at last finished reading all 448 pages of “The Language Instinct” by Steven Pinker.  (This count does not include the 78 pages of notes, glossary and index, which I was more than happy to skip over.)

As usual, I do not intend to review this book but will just share a few general impressions.  This is the second Steven Pinker work I have read — the other was “The Stuff of Thought” in 2007.  I had enjoyed “The Stuff of Thought” and so I was looking forward to this read.   But I did not realize when I started “The Language Instinct” that Pinker wrote it in 1994.  The content felt dated to me and the arguments too familiar.  “The Stuff of Thought” was  tighter and more interesting, and I would recommend it over “The Language Instinct.”

One other note.  The older I get, the more impatient I am with writers who use more words than necessary to get to the point (writers who are not concise, that is!)  Pinker tends to use many more illustrations and examples to support an argument or convey an idea than I think are necessary, and I doubt that I am more quick-witted than his average reader.  Yes, assertions need to be supported, but after a while, Pinker’s elaborations grow less and less entertaining and feel more like padding.  Douglas Hofstadter and Jared Diamond are two other authors who I have found do the same.

With non-fiction, what I look for is some unusual insight or new way of thinking about a given topic.  I only need the work to be entertaining enough so it does not put me to sleep before I have a chance to learn something from it.

My next read?  Well, I changed my mind — it will not be about the causes of World War I.   I need a break from non-fiction!  My next read will be “Ride,” a novel by David A. Walton, my creative-writing professor in 1970 (and again in 1973).  I thought it was about time that I returned the favor by reading something he has written.  His novel, published in 2002, has been favorably reviewed but I will soon let you know how I, his former student and therefore expert on such matters, liked it.  Can you wait?

Read 2 comments and add yours | Read other posts in Book Notes