Here we go.  According to the Asheville Citizen-Times today:

“Mayor Terry Bellamy is fasting and praying for a solution to the city’s budget woes and asking her friends to join her.  She asked friends on her Facebook page today to fast and pray for 24 days [emphasis mine]. She said in an interview that the timeframe doesn’t have any religious significance.  The mayor is suggesting a limited diet as a fasting plan.”

I don’t know what religious tradition our mayor follows, but it sounds very much like what Christian Assemblies International recommends: “A blessed progress will develop in the Assembly of God depending on how much the Christians pray and fast!”

It does seem that 24 days is a popular fasting duration — the best-known 24-day fast is the 1972 “fast for justice” by Cesar Chavez.  Maybe Ms. Bellamy is emulating Mr. Chavez.  Except that the “limited diet” then enjoyed by Mr. Chavez consisted only of water.

“The city faces a nearly $6 million budget gap it blames on a raft of Republican legislation aimed at taking away fees and revenue. City leaders have said they might close popular amenities like the WNC Nature Center and all city pools and athletics.”  So, just as with Mr. Chavez, this is about lettuce.

Ms. Bellamy is a Democrat.  Her action gives Democratic leadership a bad name.  Rather than do something about the problem, our fast-and-pray mayor instead makes a show of what she is not doing — (a) eating normally and (b) talking to someone who might help.  I am not impressed.

Be the first to comment | Read other posts in News and Comment

As many of my readers are already aware, I’m on a promotion tour for my other website Mountain City Arts.  I am currently selling framed prints and note cards in Asheville at More Décor Fine Consignment (for whom I also happened to have designed a website).  Eventually I will be offering prints-on-demand by mail.

This blog has consequently been a bit quiet as of late.  Only so many hours to go around.

Be the first to comment | Read other posts in The Arts

Our local newspaper’s online edition now has a feature called “Today’s Polls.”  (Your local paper probably has something similar.)  The question that the Asheville Citizen-Times has posed to its click-happy surfers today:

“Do you think parents should be able to claim a child tax exemption if even if [sic] their children register to vote on a college campus?”

With 25 votes tallied so far, 16 (64%) have said yes and 9 (36%) have said no.  The final result will not be known until the wee hours of the morning when the Ohio precincts are finally counted.  So stay tuned.

Three comments on this poll.  First, the poll question was obviously worded to inflame those who read it too quickly.  Tax exemption?  Absolutely not!  Not for people who don’t even live here!   Let the liberal college kids go home if they want to vote!

Second, one must ask (and I must ask), what does the first part of the question have to do with the second part?  The poll may as well have asked: Should parents be able to claim tax exemptions for children who (a) believe that people of the same sex can marry, or (b) think that ownership of semi-automatic weapons should be regulated, or (c) like to go to Florida for Spring Break?  When you put it this way, I don’t think so.  Or do I?

Third and finally, the poll question itself is misstated.  There is no “child tax exemption” per se.  There is a child tax credit for middle-income taxpayers with children under 17 years of age, but voting-age children are ineligible for it.  Then there are exemptions for dependents, those people related to you who meet certain age, residency and support requirements.  The residency test requires a dependent to have lived with you more than half the year, not counting absences for illness, education, vacation, or military service.  Maybe the question could have been phrased, “Should your child no longer be considered to be living with you for tax purposes if he or she registers to vote in another district?”  But that would call for too much deliberation by the typical online newspaper reader.  And it would raise messy questions like, should you be able to claim your son or daughter as a dependent if he or she registers to vote while serving in Afghanistan?

These polls are not intended to be thought-provoking or informative.  They are simply a way for websites to gauge the demographics of their readers, the better to sell advertising.  The only thing the poll needs to do is elicit a brief emotional response in the reader that produces a click of the mouse on Yes or No.  So what do you think?

  • I AGREE
  • I DISAGREE
  • I DON’T CARE
  • I DON’T KNOW
  • I DON’T EVEN WANT TO KNOW
Be the next to comment | Read other posts in News and Comment