I don’t often comment (often? never!) on international topics, but this is one I can’t resist.  Cyprus is having a financial crisis.  To alleviate the crisis, the European Central Bank asked Cyprus to charge a “tax” on the deposits in Cypriot banks, where each depositor would pay 6.75 percent of the amount in his account.

It is incomprehensible to me what message the European Central Bank intends to send.  The only message I heard from this episode is this: if you are a European with deposits in any European bank, you can lose a chunk of your savings at any moment if your friendly Euro Council decides you need to help bail out the banks.  Rational people will respond by withdrawing their money and putting it under the mattress.  This will cause banks to crash and take the economy down with them.  What the hell are the Europeans thinking?

Hopefully the government of Cyprus will reject this and lurch to a better solution — but the fact that the European Central Bank even proposed such a measure is cause for concern.  Imagine if your bank told you that your account balances were cut by 6.75 percent and you had no recourse.  Would you ever put your money in a bank again?  Simply schaapachtig.

Be the next to comment | Read other posts in One-Foot Putts

If I may compare and contrast:

In The 50s, President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned that “we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence … by the military-industrial complex.  The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”

In My 50s, President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney proved him right.

In The 50s, Americans turned on their televisions to watch the white-bread family fantasy “Leave It To Beaver” and the barely-repressed domestic violence of “The Honeymooners.”

In My 50s, Americans turned on their computers to watch television, and most of it was just as bad.  Kim Kardashian, get off my lawn.

In The 50s, Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash and Ray Charles launched successful careers with hit records and hard touring schedules.

In My 50s, musicians couldn’t make a living selling easily copied digital recordings and so they relied on heavy promotion and extravaganza tours.  Top 40?  What’s that?

In The 50s, my father shot home movies of my childhood antics on Kodak 8mm film.

In My 50s, Kodak went bankrupt.

In The 50s, “colored people” often lived in a part of town that white people avoided and, to a large extent, vice versa.

In My 50s, not much changed other than the names.  At least we were fortunate enough to see Barack Obama move into that white house down the street from the Capitol.

In The 50s, I colored with crayons, played with toy cars, read World Book encyclopedias, and was often cared for by my kind and fun-loving Great Aunt Pearl, who would use her paring knife to slice off crescents of apples, calling out each slice by a dog-food name like “Alpo” so that I (pretending to be a dog) could crawl up to her knees and beg for the treat.

On this last day of My 50s, I remember Aunt Pearl, who shaped me, like a crescent.

Be the next to comment | Read other posts in News and Comment

As the panting and sweaty reporters on the cable business channel CNBC reported today, the Dow Jones Industrial Index has reached a new peak of ecstasy, one that it has never felt in its 116-year lifetime.  Stimulated by swelling prices of stocks such as Cisco Systems  (up 2.19%) and Boeing (up 2.06%), Jones ascended to a shuddering high of 14286.37 at 11:16 am, and was able to achieve a second, albeit slightly less intense, peak of 14285.16 only 2 hours later at 1:36 pm, before sighing and falling back to close the hot-and-heavy hours-long session at a level of 14253.77.

Wall Street traders watched Jones’ crescendo with voyeuristic pleasure.  As the decisive moment neared, the floor of the New York Stock Exchange filled with frenzied shouts of “My shares are going higher!  Higher!” and “Oh God! Buy now! Buy now!”  After the peak was reached, smokers poured onto the sidewalk to have a satisfied puff and bask in the glow.

Here are some reactions from other sources:

Jeffrey Kleintop, a market strategist at LPL Financial, suggested to Bloomberg News that “a big part of the rally to all-time highs has been powered by the Fed’s very aggressive stimulus.”  David Herman of The Globe and Mail added, “It worked, but what happens when the Fed withdraws the stimulus?”

The New York Times reported that Richard Bernstein, CEO of money management firm Richard Bernstein Advisors, is confused about why more investors are not buying stocks. “I just don’t understand why people don’t want to play,” he said.

MarketWatch.com published an article titled, “Dow’s Back on Top — But Are You?

HeraldExtra.com published an article titled, “Dow Surges to Record … and Keeps Going

Finally, according to Forbes.com, “Seth Setrakian, co-head of … equity trading at First New York Securities, thinks a reversal is coming in the short-term.  The rally is ‘getting tired,’ he says, and he’s positioned accordingly.”

Some say that the index is not the best way to measure the stock market’s ups and downs.  We remind them that there are four other fingers one may employ in the endeavor.

[Correction:  In an earlier version of this story, we stated that we overheard a stock trader whispering to a hedge fund manager, “I like your stocks.  Are you long?”  In stock-market parlance, “being long” means to hold stocks as a long-term investment.  When the couple returned to the floor of the exchange after lunch, we learned that the trader had not in fact said the word “stock” but another similar word.  We apologize for the error.]

Be the first to comment | Read other posts in Finance, Humour