Our local newspaper’s online edition now has a feature called “Today’s Polls.”  (Your local paper probably has something similar.)  The question that the Asheville Citizen-Times has posed to its click-happy surfers today:

“Do you think parents should be able to claim a child tax exemption if even if [sic] their children register to vote on a college campus?”

With 25 votes tallied so far, 16 (64%) have said yes and 9 (36%) have said no.  The final result will not be known until the wee hours of the morning when the Ohio precincts are finally counted.  So stay tuned.

Three comments on this poll.  First, the poll question was obviously worded to inflame those who read it too quickly.  Tax exemption?  Absolutely not!  Not for people who don’t even live here!   Let the liberal college kids go home if they want to vote!

Second, one must ask (and I must ask), what does the first part of the question have to do with the second part?  The poll may as well have asked: Should parents be able to claim tax exemptions for children who (a) believe that people of the same sex can marry, or (b) think that ownership of semi-automatic weapons should be regulated, or (c) like to go to Florida for Spring Break?  When you put it this way, I don’t think so.  Or do I?

Third and finally, the poll question itself is misstated.  There is no “child tax exemption” per se.  There is a child tax credit for middle-income taxpayers with children under 17 years of age, but voting-age children are ineligible for it.  Then there are exemptions for dependents, those people related to you who meet certain age, residency and support requirements.  The residency test requires a dependent to have lived with you more than half the year, not counting absences for illness, education, vacation, or military service.  Maybe the question could have been phrased, “Should your child no longer be considered to be living with you for tax purposes if he or she registers to vote in another district?”  But that would call for too much deliberation by the typical online newspaper reader.  And it would raise messy questions like, should you be able to claim your son or daughter as a dependent if he or she registers to vote while serving in Afghanistan?

These polls are not intended to be thought-provoking or informative.  They are simply a way for websites to gauge the demographics of their readers, the better to sell advertising.  The only thing the poll needs to do is elicit a brief emotional response in the reader that produces a click of the mouse on Yes or No.  So what do you think?

  • I AGREE
  • I DISAGREE
  • I DON’T CARE
  • I DON’T KNOW
  • I DON’T EVEN WANT TO KNOW
Be the next to comment | Read other posts in News and Comment

I don’t often comment (often? never!) on international topics, but this is one I can’t resist.  Cyprus is having a financial crisis.  To alleviate the crisis, the European Central Bank asked Cyprus to charge a “tax” on the deposits in Cypriot banks, where each depositor would pay 6.75 percent of the amount in his account.

It is incomprehensible to me what message the European Central Bank intends to send.  The only message I heard from this episode is this: if you are a European with deposits in any European bank, you can lose a chunk of your savings at any moment if your friendly Euro Council decides you need to help bail out the banks.  Rational people will respond by withdrawing their money and putting it under the mattress.  This will cause banks to crash and take the economy down with them.  What the hell are the Europeans thinking?

Hopefully the government of Cyprus will reject this and lurch to a better solution — but the fact that the European Central Bank even proposed such a measure is cause for concern.  Imagine if your bank told you that your account balances were cut by 6.75 percent and you had no recourse.  Would you ever put your money in a bank again?  Simply schaapachtig.

Be the next to comment | Read other posts in One-Foot Putts

If I may compare and contrast:

In The 50s, President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned that “we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence … by the military-industrial complex.  The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”

In My 50s, President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney proved him right.

In The 50s, Americans turned on their televisions to watch the white-bread family fantasy “Leave It To Beaver” and the barely-repressed domestic violence of “The Honeymooners.”

In My 50s, Americans turned on their computers to watch television, and most of it was just as bad.  Kim Kardashian, get off my lawn.

In The 50s, Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash and Ray Charles launched successful careers with hit records and hard touring schedules.

In My 50s, musicians couldn’t make a living selling easily copied digital recordings and so they relied on heavy promotion and extravaganza tours.  Top 40?  What’s that?

In The 50s, my father shot home movies of my childhood antics on Kodak 8mm film.

In My 50s, Kodak went bankrupt.

In The 50s, “colored people” often lived in a part of town that white people avoided and, to a large extent, vice versa.

In My 50s, not much changed other than the names.  At least we were fortunate enough to see Barack Obama move into that white house down the street from the Capitol.

In The 50s, I colored with crayons, played with toy cars, read World Book encyclopedias, and was often cared for by my kind and fun-loving Great Aunt Pearl, who would use her paring knife to slice off crescents of apples, calling out each slice by a dog-food name like “Alpo” so that I (pretending to be a dog) could crawl up to her knees and beg for the treat.

On this last day of My 50s, I remember Aunt Pearl, who shaped me, like a crescent.

Be the next to comment | Read other posts in News and Comment