Every few months, I scan the obituaries published in the so-called newspaper-of-record of this nation, The New York Times.  In the process, I invariably get annoyed how The Times picks and chooses certain lives to elevate while other humans pass on without notice.

You don’t have to pay very close attention to see that every New York Times obituary starts with a headline like this:

Deceased, Who Did X, Dies at Age N

The “Who Did X” qualifier seems to be the most important part for The New York Times.  Here is the all-too-homogenous assortment of “Who Did X” on The Times website as it appeared on November 30, 2015:

• Designer Who Influenced Choreographer
• Utah’s First Female Governor
• Co-Founder and Re-Inventor of Fashion Brand
• Writer for Stage and for Television
• Refined the Record Player
• Nurtured Dance and Joyce SOHO in Manhattan
• Painter of Scenes From African-American Social Life
• Japanese Star of Films by Ozu and Kurosawa
• Violinist and Boston Symphony Concertmaster
• Sly and the Family Stone Trumpet Player
• Coach of Houston’s Phi Slama Jama Teams
• Star of ‘All My Children’
• Student of Texas Blues
• Bustling Host of a Range of Game Shows
• Credit Card Pioneer

When you die, you are more likely to be memorialized by The New York Times if you had made your name as an artist or performer, as 11 of these 15 people were.  I love artists but I also love scientists, park rangers, cashiers and the people behind the counter at the airport that help you navigate the ever-more-complex process of boarding a plane.  These people never appear in the obituary section of The New York Times when they die.

And neither will I.  I am not the “star” of anything.  I have not made a zillion dollars on a smartphone app that helps you get a taxi 40 seconds sooner.  I have made good music but it will remain unheard by all but a few.  In my life, and in spite of my imperfections, I tried to be a good husband, a caring and protective father, a dependable worker and an interesting person to be around, if one could get past my introversion.

Which is not enough for The New York Times.

I have a strong anti-celebrity streak in me — not sure where it came from.  I have a gut reaction listening to famous people (Scarlett Johansson, Harrison Ford, Nathan Lane and on and on and on) expound on issues both trivial and crucial as if their takes on life are more important than yours or mine.  They’re not.  But those celebrities will be the ones whose lives are memorialized by The New York Times, because they entertained us, and by us I mean the editor of The New York Times obituary page.

Craig H. Collins, Who Did All Sorts of Things, Dies Whenever.  That will be the headline  that The New York Times never prints.

Read 2 comments and add yours | Read other posts in News and Comment

It is not generally known to most Americans, but one of the more insidious provisions buried in the Affordable Care Act was the requirement that all Official Fan Clubs report their membership totals to the National Technical Information Service on September 30 of every odd-numbered year.  The most recent OFC report has just been released; I thought I would share some of it, as you are unlikely to see these figures published anywhere else.

This post focuses on the very smallest fan clubs, of those who bothered to report.  Here are the top dozen (or bottom, as it were).  Total membership is in parentheses.

• People Who Still Care About Don Draper Club (1)
• Hair Club for Trumps (1)
• We Just Can’t Get Enough of David Spade! Gang (1)
• The I Have Mixed Feelings About Tom Brady Club (2)
• I Love It When You Put Me on Hold Club (4)
• The Letter P Is NOT FUNNY Librarian League (9)
Wesley Crusher Fan Club (13)
• Toothbrush-Sharing Cooperative of Eastern Massachusetts (16)
• We Watch Boxing and Football Without a Shred of Guilt Club (18)
• Frozen Lightpole Lickers of The Upper Peninsula (19)
• Cubic Zirconia Investment Club (22)
• The 100 Billionth Person Appreciation Society (23)
• Vegans Against Cruelty to Shredded Wheat (28)

Be the first to comment | Read other posts in One-Foot Putts
No. 400

This is the 400th post on The 100 Billionth Person.  I thought I would have arrived at this milestone a little sooner, but it’s been a busy year.  I also decided this year to write fewer my-reaction-to-events pieces and more long-form walks through my garden of earthly interests.  Both factors have reduced my post count — with mixed results, I think, but you be the judge of it.

400bpI did not compile a video retrospective to mark my 400th post as I did for my 300th (watch it here).  First, there is the BTDT factor.  But more than that, it would be too minor of a celebration for someone like Christopher Hitchens.

It is his familiar and inviting yellow book-binding that I see once again on my side-table — this time, the work is Arguably: Essays by Christopher Hitchens (2011).  This volume is his penultimate collection, comprising well over one hundred of his reviews, essays and editorials.  Each bit of Hitchens I have read is arguably more substantial than any twenty of mine considered together.  I enjoy and envy his expansive knowledge and fearless choice of interesting words.

So some humility on my part is fitting and proper for my comparatively lesser level of talent.  That said, with this post, I have published a (humble) total of 161,500 words on The 100 Billionth Person.  This is the equivalent of one War and Peace by L. Tolstoy plus one Les Misérables by V. Hugo plus one The Brothers Karamazov by F. Dostoyevsky.  Impressive company, wouldn’t you say.  In fact, I was just talking to the Freethinking Monsieur Hugo the other day, and we agreed to ask Hitchens to meet us in the afterlife somewhere near the Pantheon in Paris — being that Hugo is not getting around so well these days — for un café or, in Hitchens’ case, trois Johnnie Walker.

I still like to write – it is fun to put ideas together in the same room and see what happens when they wander out to the back porch together to drink a beer.  I especially enjoy doing research for my posts, as it invariably leads to my reading more interesting things than whatever it is I am writing.  For me, those secondary gains far outweigh the usual reason that a writer writes — to be read by an involved audience.  Good thing too, considering the size of my audience.  My wife laments how little I do to increase readership.  So it goes.

Four hundred: a number insignificant in all ways except for some obscure rules about leap years.  These so-called milestone numbers are like birthdays for old people – something to make note of and be thankful for, then get up and move on.

__________

* Four hundred is also the number of legs on a four-centipede bobsled team.
Read 2 comments and add yours | Read other posts in This Blog