I can’t hold it in any longer.  I’m bursting at the seams with frustration at what passes for the news on the evening news programs (save PBS).  Tonight, I had to leave the room to escape the melodrama being acted out on The CBS Evening News with Norah O’Donnell.  Every evening, we are told there is “breaking news.”  And every evening, it sounds like the world is about to end, based on the tone of the reporters’ voices.

CBS News was once the province of Walter Cronkite, who was the “most trusted man in America” in the 1960s-70s.  I know that I trusted him.  He populated his sentences with everyday words and voiced them without effect.  You knew that what he had to say was important, not because of his inflection but because of its content.

This, of course, was before news turned into entertainment.

CBS News was the last holdout (again, excepting PBS) in over-dramatizing its reporting. ABC and NBC had adopted the flashy-graphic, tabloid-inspired “what you should be afraid of now” formula years before CBS succumbed.  But the fait is now accompli.  Uncle Walter gets another shovel of dirt tossed on his journalistic grave every time Norah begins a story by breathlessly telling her viewers, “This is important!”

And don’t get me started on how each CBS broadcast begins with 80 seconds (minimum) of fluff designed to tease and fear-heighten the upcoming news content.  That’s 80 seconds of program airtime that is not devoted to news reports — precious airtime that has already been squeezed to its profit-making minimum by prescription drug ads.

How I miss Walter!  The news today may not be fake but it is certainly too Shakespearean and, like everything else, targeted to reach the lowest common advertising denominator.

Read 3 comments and add yours | Read other posts in News and Comment

Well, we have received our absentee ballots for the upcoming election.  I have to admit, even the routine parts of this process seem to be fraught with tension this time around.  I am being extra-careful to fill in the ovals the right way, using a pen of the right color.  And I am going to drive to the election board and deliver my ballot in person, rather than take any chances with the U.S. Mail.

Yes, I am paranoid.  I am also guilty of over-valuing the importance of my ballot:

⬭  It’s not like my ballot is going to bring Ruth Bader Ginsburg back to life.

⬭  My ballot is not going to deter Mitch McConnell, whose hypocrisy observes no bounds.   McConnell and his cronies have clearly shown that hypocrisy is punished less than dogma is rewarded, and my ballot is not going to change that.

⬭  My ballot is not going to undo all the damage that Trump & Company have inflicted on democratic principles and the function of our government, at all levels.

⬭  My ballot is not going to end racism or get all the rogue police officers off the street.

⬭  There is no referendum on my ballot on whether Russia should continue to interfere with our election processes.  Or whether our leaders should invite them to do so (again).

⬭  My ballot will not take one semi-automatic weapon out of the hands of a disaffected white guy, nor will it reduce the number of disaffected white guys who want them.

So, is it not pointless for me to fill in all those ovals?  Not necessarily.  I have got to believe that voting for rational people and rational solutions is better than voting for demagogues and dogma.  That is the battle I am joining by completing and turning in my ballot.  I only wish that I could ensure others like me would do the same, in overwhelming numbers. 

• • • • 

Speaking of contests, may I remind my readers of the special 10th Anniversary Giveaway that I announced here last week (see this post).  I know I’m not Publisher’s Clearinghouse, but I am a bit surprised at the limited response so far.  I figure there could be a number of factors at work here:  (1) the subscriber notification email may have been labeled as spam;  (2) this site has fewer readers than I thought;  (3) the note cards are not appealing enough, even if they are free;  (4) some readers are choosing not to enter, to allow others to win.

Well, if you haven’t entered, all I can do is encourage you to reconsider.  To enter, please visit the post titled 10th Anniversary Giveaway and follow the instructions there.  Thanks.

Read 6 comments and add yours | Read other posts in News and Comment

This is not a hoax — I repeat — this is not a hoax.  If this were an actual hoax, you would have been instructed to tune to Infowars or The New American on your internet dial.*

No, this is the real deal.  To mark the tenth anniversary of The 100 Billionth Person, I am giving away something of value — not my commentary! — to two lucky readers of this post. The thing-of-purported-value is an assortment of press-printed 5 x 7 note cards (below, click to enlarge) that I designed back in my “I-too-can-be-an-artist” days:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

More about the cards later — first, here are the rules for my reader-appreciation giveaway.  You are qualified to enter if (a) you are a subscriber or follower of this blog, or (b) you have made a comment here prior to September 16, 2020 — proof of at least occasional interest on your part.  If you are not currently a subscriber, you can easily qualify by subscribing!  (Follow this link.)

Now that you’re qualified, you can enter the giveaway simply by commenting on this post. (You might mention in your comment which card you like best, but that’s not mandatory.) You do need to enter your email address in the email field of the comment form, otherwise I will not be able to contact you if you are selected.  Your email address will not be visible  to others.

On Monday, September 28, at noon, I will randomly select two of the entrants as winners.  If you are a winner, I will email you to obtain your mailing address and card preferences.  You may create your own assortment of ten cards, with up to three cards of any one style.  Envelopes are included.  Shipping is on me.

Now you may be saying to yourself, I don’t write notes anymore, so I don’t need any cards.  I have two responses to this.  First, stop talking to yourself — you’re so loud I can hear you. Second, I am sure that you know someone who does write notes and for whom this might be a pleasant little surprise.  So, enter anyway, if only for the pleasure of participating in the only 10th Anniversary Giveaway I will ever conduct.

Finally, here are the design details for the seven cards.  They are admittedly quirky and have dubious commercial potential, which is probably why I still have plenty to give away. There was a time when I tended to fall in love with whatever photo I shot last, and I think a couple of those are represented here.  Nonetheless, from first to last we have…

  1.  Inside: “Falling for you”
    [Created in my home studio, 2005.]
  2.  Inside: “Someone to watch over me”
    [Mark Wallinger’s Ecce Homo overlooking Trafalgar Square, London, 1999.]
  3.  Front: “The Carpenter’s Wife”.  Inside blank.
    [Upper floor of an Asheville, NC, antique store, 2005.]
  4.  Front: “Everything is just ducky.”  Inside blank.
    [Carnival in Irondequoit, NY, 2000.]
  5.  Front: “God is our strength.”  Inside blank.
    [Grave marker in Winston-Salem, NC, 2006.  Bereavement card?]
  6.  Inside: “Go slay that dragon!”
    [Storefront in Northampton, MA, 2002.]
  7.  Front: “Optimism!”  Inside blank.
    [Carnival in Irondequoit, NY, 2000.]

Remember, each winner receives ten cards, one for each year my readers have put up with the whims of this blog.

Fine Print:  No purchase necessary.  Contest void where prohibited, whatever regulatory hellhole that place may be.  Each entrant’s chance of winning is inversely proportional to the number of entries received.  [The precise formula is p(win) = 2 / n.]  Lastly, my spouse is not eligible to enter, as she prefers to make her own cards.

Thank you, and good luck.

____________

* Does anyone besides me remember the Conelrad System?
Read 7 comments and add yours | Read other posts in This Blog