Why the third mermaid, Alana, is our granddaughter’s favorite.

 

Read 3 comments and add yours | Read other posts in One-Foot Putts

It is odd but telling, in a way, how the practice of tipping — under what circumstances and how much — remains a sure-fire conversation-starter among Americans.  Our culture is divided on tips: half the time we wonder whether we’re doing it right; the rest, whether we should have to tip at all.  And to further muddy the waters, we are often expected to tip for services that are ostensibly free, included or have indeterminate value, where percentages do not apply.

We visited our children/grandchildren in Ohio over Thanksgiving, and we stayed in a Fairfield Inn for our own comfort and convenience.  Whenever we stay in a hotel, we try to remember to hang the “No Housekeeping Needed” card on our door handle — but this trip, we forgot to do so the first morning.  So we came back to the room that night to find the beds made, but not a full refresh — the ice bucket, trash baskets and coffee cups were not emptied, the coffee packs were not replenished, and used towels were not replaced.  It was a “we-were-here” courtesy call at best.

My spouse and I didn’t feel like we needed such courtesy, and so every day after that, we made sure the “Don’t Bother Me” tag was on our doorknob whenever we left the room.

Naturally, at the end of our stay, my spouse and I had a minor debate about the proper tip to leave for the housekeeping staff, considering the courtesy visit and their final remake of our room.  The fact that I won’t recount details of our debate — as interesting as you might find it! — serves to illustrate our cultural issues about tipping.  What I will say is: one of us thought we should tip x amount, the other that we should tip half that amount.

“Half-that-amount” won the day in this case.  Who was right cannot be answered.  It’s not like there was a 2023 U.S. Labor Dept. Tipping Handbook in the bedside nightstand for us to consult.  All we found there was a Bible [1] and a Book of Mormon.  (Both unread.)

But did either of us venture to open our laptop and search for hotel housekeeper tip 2023?  No, we winged it.  Truth-be-told, we probably wouldn’t have liked what we found.

What is interesting is that our notions of what to tip were based on divergent principles: one of us viewed the housekeeping visits and services rendered as a transaction; whereas the other saw the tip as a kind of charitable contribution, based on a presumption of the station-in-life of the housekeeper and the mere fact that they showed up, never mind the value of the service provided.

• • • 

One morning during our stay, I interacted with a staff person at the free breakfast buffet, the kind that most mid-scale American hotels now offer in one form or another.  You know the deal — pump-dispenser coffee; texture-free bread slices and bagels housed in polyvinyl bread-o-domes awaiting their bleary-eyed tong-extraction and clumsy conveyance to the nearby toaster; eggs, sometimes pre-packaged, assuredly not free-range but if they’re free who cares; and for the kids, a colorful tower of factory-to-bowl Froot Loops.

Come on, admit it, you’ve dispensed a Froot Loops jackpot at least once in your life.

Photo Courtesy of TripAdvisor Visitor

Anyway, one morning I wanted to take a slice of toast back to our room for my spouse, along with my own bagel and coffee, and as I was pondering how to transport everything, the sociable buffet attendant came up to me and kindly offered me a tray.  That was a first.  I thanked her, accepted the tray, loaded up my items and went on my way.

Now, I happen to think simple things like trays should be (but rarely are) readily available if a hotel wants its patrons to enjoy its humble wares in their own rooms, instead of forcing them to sit at featureless tables among nameless strangers under the droning blather of CNN or Fox News.  But I guess that’s just me (and Stephen Sondheim) asking, Where are the traysThere ought to be trays!   Send in the trays!

• • • 

All this is accessory to the fact that most complimentary hotel breakfasts feature a tip jar  invariably easier to spot than the trays.  Being that we can’t carry food back to the room in the tip jar, what are we supposed to put in that jar and why?  $2 if we exchange glances with the attendant?  $2 if we can pump a healthy stream of hot coffee into our cup instead of sputtery-warm dregs?  Maybe that’s worth $3.  Soon enough it will be $5.

Just another topic not mentioned in the 2023 U.S. Labor Department Tipping Handbook.  To think our hard-earned tax money is paying those people for such non-existent advice, says Nikki Haley through her teeth as forcibly as she can.

• • • 

Okay, but what about the kindly breakfast bar attendant?  Did I leave her a tip?  Flatly, no. It was too hard for me to make the connection between what the attendant does, how she/he is employed and compensated and why a gratuity is predicated.  A hotel breakfast buffet doesn’t look or feel like a restaurant — it’s basically a self-serve concession area.  Shouldn’t a hotel cover the cost of the food and the contract labor to provide it, without involving the patron in a so-called complimentary transaction?

Again, back to the attendant who offered me the tray!  The following morning, I happened to notice a few trays on a countertop ten steps away, which I could have used without help, had there been the same kind of sign pointing to the trays as the one calling out the tip jar.

Send in the trays?  Don’t bother, they’re here.  (Thank you, Mr. Sondheim!)

I ultimately decided that friendliness was a basic human trait that does not necessarily call for monetary compensation, even when exhibited in a hotel breakfast bar.  But even that calculation gets too complicated.

• • •  

My thesis is that the typical [2] American views tipping not as a utilitarian service charge, nor as a progressive gesture of income equalization, but as a kind of charitable donation that our culture obligates us to give to service workers, whether the service was needed or not and whether the service was adequate or not.  This creates a tension.

In the early 1900s, wealthy Americans paid tips to encourage and compensate the delivery of extra services, especially those related to prohibited drinks.  Thus the practice of tipping in the U.S. became associated with desirable off-the-books transactions for all involved.  From there, tips slowly evolved into unreported and (initially) untaxed wage supplements that were gladly embraced by service workers and hotel/restaurant owners alike.

It now seems to be American Economic Gospel (AEG) that all parties benefit when an ever greater portion of a service worker’s or cab driver’s income comes from tips:  it means less of the wage has to be paid by the business owner, which lets the owner post lower prices for their service, which (deceptively) attracts more customers, which generates more sales and more tips!  In any case, isn’t it a rule that service is better when a large tip is at stake?

[The preceding message was sponsored in part by The Libertarian Party.  Libertarians: Promising the world of your dreams, if you often dream of wandering bleak city-scapes in search of a working pay toilet.  Libertarianism: Always your fourth choice!]

• • •  

Aside:  Long, long ago in a United States of America far, far away, there was something called a punitive tip which was universally seen as such.  (This is to educate my children, for whom the very idea may be — what, the Greatest Generation and their offspring could be tip trolls?)  Patrons who were pissed off about a plate served late, or cold, or without enough cheese, or just to show who’s who in this transaction, would “send a message” by leaving a tip so tiny that there could be no mistake how displeased the customer was, and how small the customer was to leave it.

In the early 20th-century, the typical punitive tip was a dime.  One asks, why not a penny, since it is worth even less — but a penny doesn’t make a strong enough statement: the coin is dull and easy to overlook.  Whereas the U.S. dime is shiny, visible and doesn’t get left behind by mistake.  Best yet, the dime is the smallest coin in the realm, giving it additional symbolic bite.

In James Rosen’s wryly-titled book, “Scalia: Rise to Greatness“, the future Supreme Court justice’s tipping ethics, ca. 1970, were disclosed by Henry Goldberg, a Scalia lunchmate:

“Over lunch at the Roger Smith Hotel… Scalia ended the lunch angry.  He got into a fight with the waitress… He left her a dime tip.  I was appalled and said ‘Gee, let me put some more money.’  ‘No,’ Scalia erupted, ‘don’t you dare put any more money!’  ‘Well, don’t leave any tip then — a dime is an insult.’  ‘That’s just what I want to do!  I’m going to put a dime down!  That’s the tip!'”  Taken aback, Goldberg christened the incident the Dime Lunch and needled Scalia about it the rest of his life.

My next podcast-length book review:  “Scalia: Descent to Smug Petulance.”

• • •  

Strangely, given America’s incoherent mix of social, puritanical and meritocratic strains, both the standard tip and the punitive tip have grown in percentage terms over the years.  Regards the standard tip, then-renowned columnist Carlisle Bargeron [3] in the Feb. 1951 Nation’s Business noted that “the ten per cent tip has, in the course of progress and increased cost of living, gone to 15 per cent” and was now “regarded as basic” except in small towns.  Four decades later, Emily Post would update the rule:  “It wasn’t long ago that 15 percent of the bill, excluding tax, was considered a generous tip in elegant restaurants.  Now the figure is moving toward 20 percent for excellent service.”

That was 1997.  In 2023, although Emily Post continues to cite “15-20%” as the suggested sit-down restaurant tip, it’s my experience that the expected tip — after a brief stop at 18% — is now a solid 20% without regard to elegance or excellence.  The “above and beyond” tip has climbed to 22-25%, which I am sure will soon enough become the new standard.

One way to follow tipping trends is checking the gratuity calculations conveniently printed at the bottom of your restaurant tab.  If any of you happen to see a 15% tip option printed on your tab, I’d like to hear about it.  (And if you do, save it as a keepsake.)

Photo of Suggested Gratuity AmountTab from a casual dinner in Asheville, Dec. 2023

Now, all-day breakfast places (i.e., diners) operate under different rules — the food prices are relatively low and the service (all those coffee refills!) is often frequent and fast-paced.  Breakfast servers make their money based on the number of tables they serve and not the modest tips.  That’s why I tip more generously at diners — generally 25-35% or a minimum of $5 if it’s just me.

As to punitive tips, the cultural consensus seems muddled.  Today’s opinion writers tend to tip-toe around the issue of bad service, as if in denial that it even exists; they tend to advise disappointed customers to voice their concerns to management rather than letting their tip do the talking.  The implication is that one should never “penalize” the server.

Writers who do discuss tips for bad service generally mention 15% or 18% as their floor, with 10% as rock-bottom.  Personally, I have a hard time leaving less than 18% even when the food is cold or the server seemed to disappear.  Why?  Probably because I don’t want to look like a jerk over a few bucks.  If I have a bad dining experience, I’m more likely to vote with my feet and not return rather than leave a turd tip.

In my view, the owner is responsible for the patron’s whole experience — it should not be the patron’s job to figure out who to blame among the various persons and teams in an establishment.  That is why my “punitive” measure, if you will, is loss of patronage.

This places me in the “tip = service charge” segment of the populace, those who view tips as that part of a server’s wage the owner wants me to pay instead of them.  For that reason, I rarely deviate from the standard, because my “front of the house” tip has little to do with the overall quality of the experience.  It is up to the owner to own it all.

• • •  

The COVID pandemic created a dilemma in terms of tipping — and a crisis for everyone in hospitality businesses — as sit-down restaurants either closed or had to improvise take-out operations to stay afloat.  During the pandemic, we often ordered dinners-to-go from our favorite restaurants and we patriotically tipped the total as if they were sit-down dinners.  But once the pandemic faded, I began to recalibrate my tips on take-out.

Everyone draws the lines differently — for take-out, here is how I now draw mine:

💲 THE BAGEL STORE.  We never get “prepared” bagels at Bruegger’s — we just order an assorted half-dozen and bring them home.  To me, my calling out six bagels for a person to put in a bag and hand to me does not feel like “service” but lack of access.  I could just as easily bag my own if I were allowed behind the counter.

So, I’ve decided to ignore the tip choices displayed on Bruegger’s pay terminal and just click the “No Tip” button.  It gets easier every time.  I apply the same rule to any place that basically dispenses goods like a market does, without adding thought or time or value.

Side note: Bruegger’s Bagels, Einstein Bros. Bagels, Panera Bread and Krispy Kreme are all owned by JAB Holding Company, a German conglomerate.  I didn’t know that.

💲 PIZZA AND CHINESE.  Some restaurants, like our go-to pizzeria, were always strictly take-out.  Others, like our usual Chinese place, ended table service during the pandemic and never went back.  In these cases, “service” consists of a person taking a few steps, handing over your box or bags, and guiding your payment process.  During the pandemic, to support service workers in general, I was leaving 20%.  But I have since scaled back to 10-15%, that is, $3-4 to be handed a pizza, $5-6 to be handed a bagful of Chinese food.

Why the difference between Bruegger’s and our local pizza shop?  Somehow I feel more compelled to tip workers at locally-owned places than corporate ones.  Maybe I figure corporate restaurants have deeper pockets and therefore should pay their staff better instead of guilting their customers for tips.

💲 TAKE-OUT FROM SIT-DOWNS.  I also tend to tip a bit more when we order take-out from sit-down restaurants — it feels like I am somehow depriving servers from their tips when I elect to take our food home.  Again, the 20% I had been tipping during COVID is more like 15-18% now.  I’m not sure I can make a logical case for my behavior, but does logic really prevail in tipping?

• • •  

I could get into all the “incidental” tips involving bartenders, housekeeping, valet parking (never complimentary even when it supposedly is), luggage handling, etc., but I will leave advice on those to the 2023 U.S. Labor Dept. Tipping Handbook and other authorities.  What I would like to close with, however, is the trap that old people can easily fall into when it comes to dollar-denominated tips — once we get the idea that a customary tip is $2, for example, that $2 figure gets stuck in our heads for decades, without regard to its ever-declining value.

In the January 1993 issue of Successful Meetings, columnist Deborah Bright included a gratuity guide that covered the common incidentals.   Her 1993 figures are a bit amusing, but also cautionary.  Below are a few of her recommended gratutity amounts:

  • Coatroom Attendant: $1 per item
  • Parking Valet: $1 minimum
  • Baggage Handler: $1 per bag, $2 per heavy bag
  • Housekeeper: $2 per day
  • Car Wash Dryer: $1

When these figures were published, I was 40, our kids were in middle school, and we had just started to take vacations, so these were the first such guidelines I learned.  My best  calculations [4] suggest that hotel/restaurant prices have inflated 2.3x from then to now.  So, if we were only to adjust for inflation, an $89 hotel room then would cost $205 today, the housekeeping tip would now be in the $4-5 per day range, and the other figures would obviously go up accordingly.

That said, if you think that a $2.30 tip will be well-received by your parking valet in 2023, I’d advise you to drive someone else’s car to that establishment on your next visit.

• • •

Having shared a few of my own thoughts on tips (which are not necessarily shared by my spouse), it’s time for me to tip-toe.  There may be no hard and fast rules in tipping but there definitely are cultural norms, many of them unwritten, all continually evolving — which guarantees there can be no one right approach.  I invite you to comment on your own philosophy and any conundrums you face when it comes to tipping post-pandemic.

P.S.  I should disclose that I’ve received $48 in “tips” over the past year from generous readers who bought me a cup of coffee on either PetFreeHotels.com or on this site, after reading my articles about the physics of hanging pictures.  For the record, I don’t plan to report my tips to the IRS.

__________

[1]  Left there no doubt to help with good Rocky’s revival.
[2]  Insecure writers who feel the need to point out their puns and other literary bon mots to their readers lest their little gems go unnoticed… well, there should be a name for such writers.  Oh, wait.
[3]  Carlisle Bargeron, “Tips, incidentals, etc.”  Nation’s Business 39 (February 1951)
[4]  The inflation rate for restaurants and hotels has only been tracked separately since December 2009.  For the inflation rate from 1993 to 2009, I used the overall urban consumer price index.

 

Read 2 comments and add yours | Read other posts in Life
FYEye

[Original Post: September 2016]

This morning, I was doing some web searches on local retina specialists, to see if someone closer to where I live would be acceptable.  One of the doctors I looked up is a member of something called The American Eye Study Club.  Now, I have never heard of many things, and this is one of them.  Was this a group of people who conduct research on eye disease?  I was intrigued, so I did a little more looking.

It turns out that the club’s name is rather misleading.  According to its website, the AESC is a “forum for young leaders from diverse academic, geographic and practice backgrounds to openly exchange ideas and discuss new developments in a scientific and social setting that includes both members and their families.”  Well, that’s still a good thing, yes?

A bit more searching turned up a brochure for the club’s 2011 so-called annual meeting, worth 12 hours of continuing medical education (CME) credits.  The goal of the meeting, according to the brochure, was to “provide information on new technologies / medical therapies and to facilitate discussion that will lead to the development of new approaches to treatment options for patients of practicing ophthalmologists.”  In her welcome letter, the club president referred to the CME credits as “a meaningful and enticing component for your attendance.”

The 2011 annual meeting was held at the Pinehurst Resort in Pinehurst, North Carolina.  You may have heard of Pinehurst — it is home to one of the most renowned golf courses in the United States.  But that was just a coincidence.  The attendees — sorry, I meant to say, the developers of new treatment options — did not spend all their time golfing.  There was also time for some tennis and croquet.  Here was their grueling five-day agenda:

Tuesday, July 26
4:00 – 6:00 Registration
6:00 – 9:30 Welcome reception and light dinner

Wednesday, July 27
Morning – Golf outing followed by lunch
1:30 – 5:00 Technical sessions (including 15-minute coffee break)

Thursday, July 28
Morning – Tennis tournament
1:15 – 5:00  Technical sessions (including 30-minute coffee break)
6:30 – 9:00  Reception and banquet

Friday, July 29
8:00 – 12:00 Technical sessions (including 15-minute coffee break)
Afternoon/Evening – Free time and family croquet

Saturday, July 30
7:30 – 1:00  Golf outing
2:00 – 3:30 Technical sessions
3:30 – 4:00 Ice cream social
6:30 – 8:00  Reception

The time devoted to technical discussions amounted to 12 hours over the course of 5 days.

Eye DocThe same local ophthalmologist who belongs to the American Eye Study Club published a list of his professional associations on his practice’s (Asheville Eye Associates) website.  The final entry — after “Member of Western Carolina Medical Society” — was “Member of the Divot Society.”  Another group I somehow never heard of.  A search revealed that the Divot Society is listed in the professional affiliations of three North Carolina eye doctors. And these were the only references to the Divot Society I could find.

I suppose these ophthalmologists think it’s amusing to list a golf-related group (or club or society or inside joke, whatever it is) as one of their professional affiliations.  As a patient, it is certainly helpful to know important details like this when selecting a doctor.  I have nothing against golf or vacations, but listings like the American Eye Study Club and the Divot Society make me think that some doctors would rather be eyeing their putts than treating our eyes.

Local eye specialist? I’m still looking.

[UPDATE: December 2023]

After a frustrating year-long experience in 2017 with one of the bow-tied ophthalmologists at the above-named local practice — for some reason of his own, he was reluctant to treat my eye even after I told him of my visual distortion — I found an excellent retina specialist, Dr. Arman Farr, in Charlotte, who also practices in (a bit closer) Gastonia.  My spouse and I have been making the two-hour drive — me there and she back — every couple of months for the past five-plus years.  “In sickness and in health.”

Re: Doctor T. Reginald Bowtie III… he’s still on staff at Asheville Eye.  And his colleagues still list the Divot Society among their professional associations.  Apparently, not much has changed in that place, seven years later, not that I would have expected it.

Re: The American Eye Study Club…  Still going strong.  Their next meeting (2024) will be at Kilkea Castle in County Kildare, Ireland.  As always, looking for eye-opening venues to advance their studies and work on their golf swings.

Read 5 comments and add yours | Read other posts in News and Comment