Category Archives: News and Comment

That’s right.  Audience abuse.  Maybe the subject matter of this blog will not be suitable for all ages.  Parental discretion advised.

According to the theater’s published showtime, we arrived five minutes early to the late-afternoon showing of Arrival (sci-fi drama with Amy Adams) at our local cineplex.  We got our seats and were promptly greeted with a Coke commercial, followed by a five-minute promo for some Disney film called Moana with Dwayne Johnson (it looks like South Pacific action figures will be hot this Christmas) and finally, fifteen minutes of trailers for upcoming films.  And one more Coke commercial for good measure.

So we sat there a total of twenty minutes post-showtime, forced to watch advertisements for movies we never intend to see, while waiting for the feature we paid for to begin.

I know that advertising is part of the deal in movie theaters these days, but expecting us to sit through twenty minutes of it constitutes audience abuse.  The endless string of trailers put me in a decidedly bad mood by the time the movie finally started.  I hardly think that this is the experience film-makers hope to deliver to their audiences.  To me, it seems like another reason to stay home and surf the internet while my wife watches Netflix.

P.S.  I’m also tired of all those thunderous low-frequency rumbles and crashes that the sound-guy throws into every action sequence in every film.  (Does the same guy do the sound for all of them?)  But that’s another complaint for another day.

Be the next to comment | Read other posts in News and Comment

The United States is on the eve of completing a process that had its beginnings years and years ago.  No, I am not referring to the election of its first female President.  I am talking about the process of separating a melting-pot culture with a patchy purplish hue into its stark and clashing colors of red and blue.

In the world of physics, this would be characterized as an entropy-reducing process.  The usual analogy for such a process is arranging the balls that are scattered over a pool table so that the striped balls are lined up on one side and the solid balls on the opposite side.  That is pretty close to what has taken place in our nation over recent decades.

Such a process just doesn’t happen by itself.  That would be breaking the Second Law of Thermodynamics.  The Second Law says that it takes energy to decrease the entropy of a system.  Your refrigerator gets cold inside because of the energy that runs its compressor.  Likewise, the process of separating us into camps of red and blue over the years has taken energy, lots of it.  The energy comes from demagogue radio talk show hosts who profit by maintaining and appeasing devoted hard-core audiences.  It comes from politicians whose main goal is to stay in power — and who better to enlist for that goal than rabid followers?  And it comes from corporations and other rich donors who fuel the process with money, without which none of the above takes place.

So, it’s not Clinton vs. Trump tomorrow, not really.  It is those who would solve problems vs. those who would gain from conflict and division.  Regardless of the election outcome, the forces that separate us today will continue to do so tomorrow.  This is because of the many who have something to gain from our polarization, people with money and energy to pump into our system, to make us cold and hostile to each other.  Those people know their way around the Second Law.

The answer, at least my answer, is to remain civil and rational.  Try not to pick fights with friends, family or Facebookers.  Save your most passionate words for the occasions when you are “speaking to your choir.”  Be as critical of the leaders and positions of your own political persuasion as you are of others.  Don’t just argue about or advocate for specific candidates, as candidates come and go (mostly go).  Instead, voice your expectations of how the political process should work and how the business of running the nation should be conducted.  Voice it to your friends.  Voice it to your representatives.

Unless we think of ourselves as a purple people again, not red or blue, we can’t expect our politicians to treat us differently.  We have work to do tomorrow and many days after to bridge the divide that powerful interests invested so much energy in creating.

Read 3 comments and add yours | Read other posts in News and Comment

Colin Kaepernick -  Image via Getty/Thearon W. HendersonThe kneel-down protest by NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick and his supporters during performances of The Star Spangled Banner has had an Edward Snowden-like effect: it has forced Americans to take sides on an issue that was heretofore invisible.  And it has produced a very interesting and unexpected twist: according to the current narrative, how we act during our national anthem is indicative of our level of support for United States military forces.

When did our armed forces hijack our national anthem, I ask?  The answer is, they didn’t.

U.S. military forces are once again pawns in our political games.  Soldiers, sailors, pilots and marines are America’s poster children: because they cannot be legitimately attacked, every political persuasion attempts to use them as the human shield for their cause.  If you believe X (where X is what my opponent believes), then you are against our servicemen and servicewomen, and shame on you for being anti-American, and who cares what you think anyway, you ingrate.  You should be thankful that our soldiers protect your sorry ass.

That’s the narrative, anyway.  For the record, I decided that I’m OK with Mr. Kaepernick.  Black lives matter.  Period.  There is still much fighting to do on that front, and Kaepernick has enlisted as one of the soldiers in that battle.  So I ask, please, support our troops.

Read 4 comments and add yours | Read other posts in News and Comment