Category Archives: News and Comment

Once in a while, one learns something valuable by reading the news.  Today, thanks to the New York Times, I learned how much glyphosate (the active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup) is found in various snacks and breakfast cereals, including the venerable and supposedly kid-friendly Cheerios.  R-O-undupYou can read the results for yourself, as reported by the lab that performed the tests.

I was astounded by the concentration of glyphosate found in Cheerios, my favorite cereal: 1125 parts per billion.  I know, that is just a number, but compare this to what the same lab found in other familiar products: Cool Ranch Doritos, 481 parts per billion (ppb); Wheaties, 31 ppb;   Trix, 10 ppb; Lay’s Classic Potato Chips, zero.  The lower detection limit of the glyphosate test, according to the published test method, is 5 ppb.

How much is 1125 parts per billion?  If one were to eat a bowl (say one-and-a-half ounces) of Cheerios every day for a year, one would consume roughly 0.0006 ounces (0.017 grams, or 17 milligrams) of glyphosate.  How much is 17 milligrams?  It is about the same weight as thirty human hairs, each four inches long.  Or seven mosquitoes.  Or a very, very, very tiny football field.

I have no idea whether consuming this amount of glyphosate is harmful.  Many studies claim it is not, or at least that there is no evidence of harm.  But I still have to ask, why do Cheerios have 100 times more glyphosate per bowl than Trix?  Why should Cheerios need so much glyphosate?  For answers, I decided to search the websites of Cheerios and then General Mills.  The Cheerios website returns no results for glyphosate.  The General Mills website responds with this statement, which does not specifically mention glyphosate:

Thanks for taking the time to ask us about this important issue.  At General Mills, our holistic approach to sustainable agriculture includes reducing environmental impacts and strengthening our agricultural supply chain. … We continue to work closely with farmers, our suppliers and conservation organizations to minimize the use of pesticides on the crops and ingredients we use in our foods. 

This is the very definition of corporate dissembling.  So I wrote a note to General Mills asking them to respond specifically about glyphosate levels in Cheerios.  Here was their obviously pre-packaged reply:

Thank you for contacting Cheerios.

Our products are safe and without question they meet regulatory safety levels. The EPA has researched this issue and has set rules that we follow as do farmers who grow crops including wheat and oats.  We continue to work closely with farmers, our suppliers and conservation organizations to minimize the use of pesticides on the crops and ingredients we use in our foods.

Thank you for your interest in Cheerios.  We hope this information is helpful to you.

Sincerely,
Brian Walters
Consumer Relations Representative

Brian is again careful to make no mention of glyphosate, as if there is no issue to discuss. Sorry, Brian.  When there is a 100-to-1 difference in glyphosate levels in two of your own breakfast cereals (Cheerios vs. Trix), it suggests that herbicide usage is indeed an issue.  Could it possibly be that oats (Cheerios) are heavily treated but corn (Trix) is not?

I’ll answer that: it sure could be.  I came across another study that tested glyphosate levels in Quaker Steel Cut Oats.  You remember oatmeal, that good old stick-to-your-ribs stuff.  The study found 1530 parts per billion of glyphosate in Quaker Oats, even higher than the level in Cheerios.  Consider: the amount of glyphosate in a cup of Quaker Steel Cut Oats is twice the amount of fluoride in a cup of drinking water.

As I was to learn, oat farmers are the culprit here — their “holistic approach to sustainable agriculture” involves intentionally spraying Roundup on their oats to dry (dessicate) the crop prior to harvest.  Yum.  Taste the flavor.

• • •

You know, I am not an alarmist.  I am not the type of person to throw numbers around to intimidate or frighten people.  In this article, I raised my eyebrows at glyphosate levels of 1000 parts per billion, fully aware that the European Union, for example, allows oats to contain 20,000 parts per billion of glyphosate — twenty times the level in Cheerios.  Still, 1000 parts per billion of anything not meant to be consumed but intentionally added suggests to me wanton and/or careless use.

I make this distinction because we consume non-food substances in our food all the time.  Did you know the EPA allows 700 parts per billion of glyphosate in our drinking water?  Or that the peppercorns in your grinder are allowed to contain 2000 ppb of rodent feces? (Would you like fresh ground pepper with your rat?)  One Scientific American blogger estimated that we eat one or two pounds of flies, maggots and bugs each year, mixed in with the stuff we actually want to eat.  If you are a food purist, you have not only lost the battle but the war.

But back to Cheerios.  I was unhappy with General Mills’ response to my query, though it was pretty much what I expected.  Glyphosate is not water.  It is a herbicide.  It should be applied to weeds, not crops.  It should not be casually used as a crop dessicant.  And it should not be an ingredient in oats, regardless of whether it has been shown to harm us.

Roundup Free CheeriosI will not buy Cheerios — or any other oat cereal — until its glyphosate content is lowered to levels comparable to those in other cereals.  This will not happen until oat farmers use  herbicides more responsibly.  And that will not happen until General Mills, Quaker Oats and the rest of Big Food come to see low-glyphosate — like gluten-free — as a marketable and profitable product feature.

It’s time to voice our demand for Roundup-Free Cheerios.  Until we get them, we should not buy them.  Simple as that.  Now, as for our drinking water…

Be the next to comment | Read other posts in News and Comment

It’s not often that I find spam entertaining, but I thought I would share the first paragraph of one I just received.  It was “from” Mr. Laird Roberts and its subject was “Honestly I am just disappointed at your behavior.”  What a slap in the face!  It’s like you open the door, and there stands Moe, fuming.

Anyway, here is what I read, before I got bored and skimmed over the rest of the text:

“Honestly I am just disappointed at your behavior because you know that I am man of God and cannot deceive you.  Just pay the $85.00 and leave me and my God because God is watching me if I am telling you lies.  I know it is because of your past experience that make you not to believe me but I told you before my God who is my witness that I cannot deceive you because my bible says what shall it profit a man to gain material things and loose your soul.  I told you earlier just drop your old experience and follow my instruction as a man of God and you will know what it means to follow somebody that fear God.”

Pretty novel approach, I must say.  This spammer is not only incoherent (as one expects) but instantly sets off on a self-righteous tirade, dressing down the very person from whom he hopes to extract money.  Really, how many rich, gullible, masochistic, religiously-guilty suckers are out there?  I guess all of them will soon find out.

Read 3 comments and add yours | Read other posts in News and Comment

An item from The If Trump Really Wants to Fix Something Department:

I am planning to go on a photo outing with old photography friends from Canada in July.  To save money, I have been looking at flights to Toronto from nearby airports, including Charlotte (two hours to the east of me) and Knoxville (two hours to the west).

The best-priced flight I have found leaves Knoxville at 11:05 am and arrives in Toronto at 6:28 pm, with one stop.  The round-trip ticket costs $253 and the trip duration is 7 hours 23 minutes.  Add two hours for the drive to Knoxville and two hours advance-arrival at the airport for international flights, and I would have to leave the house at 7:00 am.

Alternatively, I could depart from Charlotte at 4:25 pm and arrive in Toronto at 6:28 pm on a non-stop flight.  The trip duration is only 2 hours 3 minutes but this round-trip ticket  costs $595.  With the two-hour drive and two-hour advance arrival, I would need to leave the house at aboout 12:30 pm.  I could have both breakfast and lunch at home.

Astute readers may have noticed where I am going with this.  Yes, the Knoxville trip and the Charlotte trip arrive in Toronto at the same time.  The first leg of the Knoxville flight heads to — where else — Charlotte.  There, the plane sits on the tarmac 4 hours 11 minutes as it morphs from a one-stop $253 flight into a non-stop $595 flight to Toronto.

The bottom line is that American Airlines hopes that I will pay another $342 for the sake of saving 5 hours 2o minutes in this bizarre air-flight tango that seems to have nothing to do with the cost or logic of travel but everything to do with good-old supply-and-demand.

I am considering driving the thirteen hours to Canada, not that the airlines care.  They are confident they will get somebody to pay who is willing to pay.  Just like the hokey-pokey, that’s what it’s all about.

Read 2 comments and add yours | Read other posts in News and Comment