
Search for…
Recent Comments
- Stephanie Velsmid on Adventures in Mountain Time
- Craig on Promises I’ve Made
- Eric on Promises I’ve Made
- Rob on Promises I’ve Made
- Craig on Promises I’ve Made
Favorites
Search by Type
Search by Month
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (5)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (5)
- July 2019 (6)
Search by Year
Links to Friends
-
Because why not?
- Enrique Guerra-Pujol, law professor and author
- Bruce Irving, singer-songwriter and space enthusiast
- Eric Maatta, bird and landscape photography
- Art Sands, black-and-white photography
- Rob Simbeck, author and songwriter
The Trend
S&P 500
3132.5THE TREND
2772.913 % ABOVE TREND 95 WEEKS AHEAD OF TREND You Could Be Subscriber 35!
- Sign up for ad-free update notices!
From the Department of Bad Statistics: The New York Times just published an article titled “Afraid of Snakes? Wasps and Dogs are Deadlier.” It supports this claim by citing the number of deaths due to encounters with various animals between 2008 and 2015. According to the article, the number of Americans who died from snakebites during this period was 48, compared to 272 from dogs and 478 from stinging insects.
Even if we agree that wasps and dogs caused more deaths over this timeframe, they are not necessarily deadlier. Most people have far fewer encounters with snakes than with bees (whose food sources are everywhere) or dogs (whose owners are everywhere). I may spot a snake around here every two or three years. And when I do, I give them a far wider berth than I do dogs. Both of these factors are likely to play a part in the relatively low number of snakebite deaths among the general population, compared to those from bees or dogs.
I think the New York Times could have framed this story in a less sensational and more informative way, but it just goes to show how journalists and scientists have different aims and often abide by different rules. Afraid of scientists? Journalists are deadlier!